Discussion Paper 16

Author
Jean-Louis Martres, Jean-Michel Carnus, Christophe Orazio

More information

This discussion paper analyses the value of indicators for assessing sustainable forest management in the context of cultivated forests. It shows the diversity of indicators, the weaknesses of existing ones, and the benefits of new indicators tested during the FORSEE project. The paper also demonstrates the variability in the quality of indicators, and the limits of their comparability.

The paper provides a summary and comparative analysis of the FORSEE project results. The FORSEE project, which ran from 2003-2006, studied indicators for sustainable forest management at a regional scale. A full set of internationally agreed criteria and indicators from MCPFE (now known as FOREST EUROPE) was tested over a network of pilot zones in eight Atlantic regions: Aquitaine, Castilla y Leon, Galicia, Basque Country, Ireland, Portugal Centre (Lousa), Navarra, and Portugal Centre (Sousa Valley).

The FORSEE project was co-funded by the INTERREG IIIB Atlantic area and regional donors: Conseil regional d’Aquitaine, Gobierno de Navarra, Govierno vasco, Junta de Castilla y Leon and Xunta de Galicia.
 

Recommended citation:

Jean-Louis Martres, Jean-Michel Carnus and Christophe Orazio. 2011. Are MCPFE Indicators Suitable for Planted Forests? Discussion Paper 16. European Forest Institute.

Number of pages: 48
ISBN 978-952-5453-86-7 (printed)
ISBN 978-952-5453-85-0 (online)

EFI Tags